|
About the Commons Communities Project
I'm Michael Jensen, and the Commons Communities Project is my brainchild.
I've been doing Internet stuff for 35+ years (yes, even before the Web existed),
mostly in the nonprofit scholarly publishing world.
In the Fall of 2022, I
was able to "retire," so I could build projects that were unlikely to be built otherwise:
low-profit or no-profit digital projects that might be useful for our world.
And alas, our world is burning. As I wrote recently in an essay: we each have a responsibility
to do whatever we can, to add a few drops to the buckets available to hurl against the climate inferno that
human society has created. We each
must bring our peculiar talents to bear on the problem; Commons Communities is my implementation of that principle.
For most of the last fifteen years, I've lived in delightful rural Nova Scotia, including nearly a decade on a
gorgeous sustainable farm on a long gravel road, thirty minutes' drive from the nearest grocery store.
In the decades before that, we'd mostly lived in the Baltimore-Washington Metro area (after moving from Lincoln, Nebraska),
so I've ended up
learning a lot about the many differences between city living and rural living.
Rural = Different Communities, Different Transit, Different Rhythms
I won't wax rhapsodic about rural living -- better writers than I have done that, and it's all true.
But there are also drawbacks.
Because of the low population density, personal cars are utterly essential: there are virtually no taxi services,
nor Ubers, nor Lyfts, nor scheduled bus routes or
trains or trams. And it's a long way to anywhere. We each pretty much have to have a car. And we drive everywhere.
Rural folks drive far more, over longer distances, than urban folks.*
We country towns have also lost most of our media in the last few decades, as small regional newspapers struggled and died,
taking with them a lifeline of information, interconnections, and shared experience within a small community. And we have
seen the decline of other hyper-local institutions (churches in particular) that helped spur shared activities, and a
shared set of goals.
Originally, this project was called Rural Carpool, and was aimed at helping a small region of a dozen small towns address their
"Rural Transit
Problem" by providing tools to coordinate carpools to larger towns, to save costs and CO2.
It was well received, but was intrinsically limited.
It became clear to me that to have a real impact,
the project had to get both smaller and broader.
We needed
to focus on a "microregion" (a small town or village, and its nearby hamlets); we also broadened the
toolset offered, to address other hyperlocal needs. And thus, we
evolved into the Commons Community.
We integrated Member Communications, Classified Ads, local Events, and a local Business directory along with the
local Carpool options, creating a hyperlocal online infrastructure for self-organization by
small communities -- to save money, time, and CO2.
Enabling Technology
We are engineering this system so that we could (fairly) easily roll out hundreds,
even thousands of locally-designed and locally-maintained Commons Communities,
in which a local leader or two, with some online savvy, could set up a local Commons Community infrastructure in a dozen hours,
gather some like-minded folks as the Advisory Board, promote the Commons locally, and then invest a few hours a week
in maintenance and occasional promotion -- in order to provide their community with a Commons site tailored to
their microregional needs. We have designed for this Manager role to be a sustainable, freelance, paid, very part-time job,
for a committed community member, or a small local group or committee.
And it's free? How will you survive financially?
By its nature and design, the Commons Community system cannot be a gigantic moneymaker for a bunch of stockholders,
no matter how many Commons Communities get created. No venture capitalist would underwrite it, nor do I want them to.
The system doesn't require (or even accept) money directly from its Member users. Carpooled Trip costs are shared equally
and privately between the Riders and the Driver. Classifieds do not cost Members anything.
No businesses are charged for being
in the Commons Business Directory. All coordination is self-directed and self-organized. So how does a Commons
survive financially?
A Commons Community is a niche service that works only as a cooperative system.
We hope to have parts of our salaries (and the part-time income of each local Manager) funded by a mixture of
local sponsorships, advertising, and foundation support for local initiatives.
It's not a model that prioritizes capital, monetization, or "enhanced shareholder value," but should sustain
both growth and
continued improvement. The appropriate mix of support will depend upon the region, its community character, and its own
governance and funding systems. We are not locked into any single model.
Each Commons Community has its own database and domain website, and a common software infrastructure. We lean
toward keeping control local whenever possible.
Each Commons will likely have its own flavors of
internal governance and self-definition. Our decentralized model is designed to do
one complicated but simple thing: to help local folks purposefully connect, and then let the
humans work out the details of their own cooperation.
Finally:
For me, this decentralized, distributed model of self-organization and shared support means
that the Commons Communities can both grow and
be sustainable, without charging the actual Members,
without requiring venture capitalists, and without being driven by profit maximization.
The Commons can just do its job, of
helping people self-organize to improve their lives, and reduce their impact on the ecosystem.
We shall see where the Commons Community model goes, and whether we can get Commons Communities
popping up like beneficial weeds,
all over North America, saving CO2 and strengthening rural communities.
To me, this isn't a business, but rather a personal mission,
and I'll keep improving the system as we get feedback.
If we do things right, I might be able to
a) help make rural living more efficient for Members,
b) save a lot of people a lot of money, and
c) save a LOT of CO2 and other pollutants.
I should have "retired" earlier!
--Michael
|